ALIEV v. UKRAINE View

Notes

Date	29/04/2003
AppNr	41220/98
Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	3; 35-1; 41; 8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated	3838
Citations	235-15-35-45-56-1813146-181213

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 3
No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill-treatment by prison officers
No violation of Art. 8
No violation of Art. 8 with regard to denial of conjugal visits
No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later restrictions on receipt of parcels
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion)
Violation of Art. 3
Violation of Art. 3 with regard to prison conditions
Violation of Art. 8
Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial restrictions on receipt of parcels

Keywords:

(art. 10-2) foreseeability
(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 8-1) respect for correspondence
(art. 8-1) respect for family life
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law
(art. 8-2) prevention of crime
(art. 8-2) prevention of disorder

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction)
Language	English
Application Number	41220/98
Importance Level	1
Respondent State	Ukraine
Date of Judgment	29/04/2003
Conclusion	Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) ; Violation of Art. 3 with regard to prison conditions ; No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill-treatment by prison officers ; Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial restrictions on receipt of parcels ; No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later restrictions on receipt of parcels ; No violation of Art. 8 with regard to denial of conjugal visits ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Articles	3 ; 8-1 ; 8-2 ; 35-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Instruction of 20 April 1998 ; Correctional Labour Code, Article 41(3) ; Pre-trial Detention Act 1993, sections 1, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13
Strasbourg Case Law	Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 69 ; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 48, ECHR 2001-III ; E.L.H. and P.B.H. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 32094/96 and 32568/96, Commission decision of 22 October 1997, Decisions and Reports 91, p. 61 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161 in fine ; Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, ECHR 2001-XI ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95, 96 and 101, ECHR 2002-VI ; Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, pp. 17-18, § 30 ; Kruslin v. France, judgments of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, § 27 ; Huvig v. France, judgments of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, § 26 ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, §§ 119 and 121, ECHR 2000-IV ; Messina v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25498/94, § 61, ECHR 2000-X ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68, 74, ECHR 2001-III ; Petra v. Romania, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, p. 2853, § 36 ; Selmouni v. France (no. 25803/94, §§ 74-77, ECHR 1999-V ; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84, and p. 38, § 98 ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 41, § 104 ; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX ; Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII
External Sources	Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1097(1996) on the abolition of the death penalty in Europe ; Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1112 (1997) on the honouring of the commitment entered into by Ukraine upon accession to the Council of Europe to put into place a moratorium on executions ; Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1179 (1999) and Recommendation 1395 (1999) on the honouring of obligations and commitments by Ukraine ; Reports of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment reports on visits to Ukraine in 1998, 1999 and 2000
Keywords	"(Art. 10-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER"

Application Documents 1

ALIEV v. UKRAINE

Court (Fourth Section) Decision

25/05/1999

References 19

	219 KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA 3, 5-3, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/07/2002
	148 CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2002
	179 KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA Court (Third Section) Decision	18/09/2001
	235 PEERS v. GREECE 3, 8, 6-2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/2001
	1907 KUDLA v. POLAND 5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	161 VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA Court (Third Section) Decision	14/03/2000
	133 DOUGOZ v. GREECE Court (Third Section) Decision	08/02/2000
	177 V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 5-4, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1999
	934 SELMOUNI v. FRANCE 3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1999
	105 MESSINA v. ITALY Court (Second Section) Decision	08/06/1999
	51 PETRA v. ROMANIA 8, 25 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	7 E.L.H. AND P.B.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Second Chamb… Decision	22/10/1997
	880 AKDIVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8, 25-1, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/09/1996
	329 KLAAS v. GERMANY 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/09/1993
	61 HUVIG v. FRANCE 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/04/1990
	308 SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 6-3-c, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/1989
	228 SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1983
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978

Show all (19)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 12

Citations 12

	6 OSVÁTHOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA 5-4, 5-5 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2010
	33 SILIH v. SLOVENIA 2 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/04/2009
	22 PETROV v. BULGARIA 6-1, 8, 14, 13, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/05/2008
	2 DICKSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/12/2007
	2 NAZARENKO v. LATVIA 5-1, 5-3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/02/2007
	13 KOVAL v. UKRAINE 3, 13, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/10/2006
	14 KONTROVA v. SLOVAKIA Court (Fourth Section) Decision	13/06/2006
	26 DICKSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	18/04/2006
	3 SCHEMKAMPER v. FRANCE 13, 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/10/2005
	26 KOVAL v. UKRAINE Court (Second Section) Decision (Final)	30/03/2004

ECHR CaseLaw

ALIEV v. UKRAINE View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 19

Citations Breakdown

Citations 12

Similar documents