NAUMENKO v. UKRAINE View

Notes

Date	10/02/2004
AppNr	42023/98
Body	Court (Second Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	13; 3; 35-1
Violated / NonViolated	313
Citations	235-15-25-35-466-16-3-c8111334235-16-1834

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 13
No violation of Art. 3

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 3) inhuman treatment

Application Documents 1

NAOUMENKO contre l'UKRAINE

Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)

07/05/2002

References 33

	81 TEKIN ET AUTRES contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision (Final)	25/09/2003
	37 PANTEA v. ROMANIA 3, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-3-c, 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/06/2003
	6 TESS contre la LETTONIE Court (First Section) Decision	12/12/2002
	181 MOUISEL v. FRANCE 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/11/2002
	24 D.G. v. IRELAND 5-1, 5-5, 3, 8, 14, 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/05/2002
	26 ABDURRAHMAN ORAK v. TURKEY 2, 3, 13 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/02/2002
	30 SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING contre l'UKRAINE Court (Fourth Section) Decision	27/09/2001
	29 LAMANNA v. AUSTRIA 6-2, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/07/2001
	122 KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13, 2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/04/2001
	26 CASES OF ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND DEBORDES AND OMER v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/11/2000
	1907 KUDLA v. POLAND 5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	195 DIKME v. TURKEY 5-3, 3, 5-2, 6-1, 6-3-c, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2000
	343 ILHAN v. TURKEY 3, 13, 2 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	519 SALMAN v. TURKEY 2, 3, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	132 NUUTINEN v. FINLAND 6-1, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	136 ROTARU v. ROMANIA 8, 13, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/05/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	104 THLIMMENOS v. GREECE 14, 9, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	177 V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 5-4, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1999
	934 SELMOUNI v. FRANCE 3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1999
	663 ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 3, 13, 5-3, 5-4, 25-1, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/10/1998
	86 AERTS v. BELGIUM 5-1, 6-1, 5-4, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/07/1998
	375 KAYA v. TURKEY 2, 13, 2, 14, 6, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/02/1998
	145 RANINEN v. FINLAND 5-1, 3, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1997
	722 AKSOY v. TURKEY 3, 5-3, 13, 25-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	43 HURTADO v. SWITZERLAND Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	28/01/1994
	68 HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA 5-4, 8, 10, 3, 5-1, 5-3, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/09/1992
	271 VILVARAJAH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	30/10/1991
	285 POWELL AND RAYNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	21/02/1990
	308 SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 6-3-c, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/1989
	684 BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/1988
	26 BAGGETTA v. ITALY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1987
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978

Show all (33)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 50

Citations 50

	MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. GEORGIA 2, 34 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/11/2011
	GOROBET v. MOLDOVA 5-1, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/10/2011
	GOGINASHVILI v. GEORGIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	04/10/2011
	BELAYEV v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Decision	22/03/2011
	1 ELEFTERIADIS v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/01/2011
	1 JASINSKIS v. LATVIA 2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2010
	1 RAFFRAY TADDEI v. FRANCE 3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2010
	2 DOBRI v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/12/2010
	2 UMAR KARATEPE v. TURKEY 3, 5-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/10/2010
	XIROS v. GREECE 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/09/2010

Originating Body	Court (Second Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	42023/98
Importance Level	2
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Ukraine
Date of Judgment	10/02/2004
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 13
Articles	3 ; 13 ; 35-1
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	343/96, § 180, 3 June 2003, ECHR 2003 ; Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 14, § 31 ; Raninen v. Finland, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports 1997-VIII, pp. 2821-2822, §§ 55, 56 ; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 40, ECHR 2000-V ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, §§ 81-88, ECHR 2000-VII ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 39-44, §§ 100-111 ; Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 56, ECHR 2002-VII ; Tekin v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp. 1517-1518, §§ 52 and 53 ; Tess v. Latvia (dec.), no. 34854/02, 12 December 2002 ; Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 28, ECHR 2000-IV ; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, §§ 69, 71, ECHR 1999-IX ; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 36, § 107 ; Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2438, 2442, §§ 98, 113
External Sources	Recommendation no. R(98)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT"

ECHR CaseLaw

NAUMENKO v. UKRAINE View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 33

Citations Breakdown

Citations 50

Similar documents