NAOUMENKO contre l'UKRAINE  View

Notes

Date07/05/2002
AppNr42023/98
BodyCourt (Second Section)
TypeDecision (Partial)
Articles13; 3; 35-1; 35-3; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated
Citations35-15-35-46-28345-1
Conclusions:
  • Remainder admissible
  • Remainder inadmissble
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) right to an effective remedy
  • (art. 3) degrading treatment
  • (art. 3) inhuman treatment
  • (art. 35-1) final domestic decision
  • (art. 35-3) ratione temporis



Application Documents 1

50
NAUMENKO v. UKRAINE 
3, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)
10/02/2004

Google



References 2

2
ORAK contre la TURQUIE
Court (Second Section) Decision
29/03/2001
519
SALMAN v. TURKEY 
2, 3, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/06/2000

Citations Breakdown

Citations 4

PAVALACHE v. ROMANIA 
3, 6-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/10/2011
DEMIAN v. ROMANIA 
3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/09/2011
OSHURKO v. UKRAINE 
3, 5-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
08/09/2011
1
BIRZNIEKS v. LETTONIE 
5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 8, 34, 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
31/05/2011


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List