VITAN v. ROMANIA View

Notes

Date	25/03/2008
AppNr	42084/02
Body	Court (Third Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	29-3; 35-1; 41; 6-1; 6-2; 6-3; 6-3-c; 8
Violated / NonViolated	6-286-16-3
Citations	35-36-2P1-1

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3
Non-pecuniary damage - award
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Remainder inadmissible
Violation of Art. 6-2
Violation of Art. 8

Keywords:

(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-2) presumption of innocence
(art. 6-3) rights of defence
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
(art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
(art. 6-3-c) legal assistance of his own choosing
(art. 6-3-d) obtain attendance of witnesses
(art. 8-1) respect for correspondence
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	42084/02
Importance Level	2
Represented by	MATEUT G.
Respondent State	Romania
Date of Judgment	25/03/2008
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3 ; Violation of Art. 6-2 ; Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles	6-1 , 6-2 , 6-3, 6-3-c , 8 , 29-3 , 35-1 , 41
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	Allenet de Ribemont, v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, §§ 35, 38 ; B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, p. 14, § 36 ; Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, § 67, 5 October 2004 ; Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 107, 12 October 2004 ; Calogero Diana v. Italy, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1775, § 28 ; Cotlet v. Romania, no. 38565/97, §§ 35, 45, 3 June 2003 ; Craxi v. Italy (no. 1), no. 34896/97, § 84, 5 December 2002 ; Croissant v. Germany, judgment of 25 September 1992, Series A, no. 237-B, § 29 ; Daktaras v. Lithuania no. 42095/98, §§ 41, 43, 44, ECHR 2000 X ; Doorson v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1996, Reports 1996 II, §§ 66, 67 ; F.A. v. Turkey (Dec.), no. 36094/97, 11 May 1999 ; Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, pp. 16-17, § 32 ; Mujea v. Romania (Dec.), no. 44696/98, 10 September 2002 ; Negoescu v. Romania (Dec.), no. 55450/00, 17 March 2005 ; Petra v. Romania, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998 VII, pp. 2853-2854, §§ 37 and 38 ; Rosengren v. Romania (Dec.), no. 70786/01, 27 April 2004 ; Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 63, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 April 1997, Reports 1997-III, p. 711, § 50 ; Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, pp. 23-24, § 9 ; Y.B. and Others v. Turkey, nos 48173/99 and 48319/99, §§ 43-44, 28 October 2004
Keywords	"(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-2) PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE TIME" "(Art. 6-3-b) PREPARATION OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-c) LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF HIS OWN CHOOSING" "(Art. 6-3-d) OBTAIN ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"

References 16

	4 ROSENGREN v. ROMANIA 6-1, P4-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/04/2008
	12 NEGOESCU c. ROUMANIE Court (Third Section) Decision	17/03/2005
	45 BURSUC v. ROMANIA 3, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/10/2004
	34 BARBU ANGHELESCU v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/10/2004
	25 COTLET v. ROMANIA 8, 34 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/06/2003
	23 S.A.R.L. DU PARC D'ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM and LA S.C.I HASELAECKER v. FRANCE Court (Second Section) Decision	18/03/2003
	43 CRAXI v. ITALY 6-1, 6-3-d, 6-1, 6-3-b Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/12/2002
	33 MUJEA contre la ROUMANIE Court (Second Section) Decision	10/09/2002
	77 SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 6-1, 6-3-a, 6-3-b, 6-3-d Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/07/2001
	52 DAKTARAS v. LITHUANIA 6-1, 6-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/10/2000
	2 ANLI v. TURKEY Court (First Section) Decision (Partial)	11/05/1999
	51 PETRA v. ROMANIA 8, 25 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	65 CALOGERO DIANA v. ITALY 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/1996
	35 CROISSANT v. GERMANY 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/09/1992
	2 MINELLI v. SWITZERLAND Commission (Plenary) Decision	17/12/1980
	214 WEMHOFF v. GERMANY 5-3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	27/06/1968

1–3 of 3

Citations 3

	G.C.P. v. ROMANIA 6-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2011
	BEGU v. ROMANIA 5-3, P1-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/03/2011
	MICU v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/02/2011

Similar documents

	HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 35, 35-1, 41	26/07/2011
	29 RUPA v. ROMANIA (No. 1) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-c, 8, 8-2, 13, 13+3, 34, 35-1, 41	16/12/2008
	221 CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 34, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-a, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 8, 13, 41	28/06/1984
	1 BOGUMIL v. PORTUGAL Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6-1, 6-3-c, 6-1+6-3-c, 8, 8-2, 29-3, 35-1, 41	07/10/2008
	10 GUTU v. MOLDOVA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5-1-c, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 8-1, 8-2, 13, 29-3, 41	07/06/2007
	4 KUVIKAS v. LITHUANIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 5-1-c, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-d, 6-3-e, 29-3, 35-1, 35-3, 41	27/06/2006
	1 MKHITARYAN v. ARMENIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5-2, 6-1, 6-3, 6-3-b, 29-3, 35-1, 41, P7-2	02/12/2008
	28 GALSTYAN v. ARMENIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 10, 11, 29-3, 35-1, 41, P7-2	15/11/2007
	30 HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5-1, 5-3, 6-1, 6-2, 29-3, 35-1, 41	07/11/2006
	1 TADEVOSYAN v. ARMENIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6-1, 6-3, 6-3-b, 29-3, 35-1, 41, P7-2	02/12/2008