BENSAID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

Date	06/02/2001
AppNr	44599/98
Body	Court (Third Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	13; 3; 8
Violated / NonViolated	3813
Citations	36-16-381314P1-1236-1891314P1-1

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 13
No violation of Art. 3
No violation of Art. 8

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 3) inhuman punishment
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) economic well-being of the country
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 8-2) prevention of crime
(art. 8-2) prevention of disorder

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-I
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	44599/98
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	the United Kingdom
Date of Judgment	06/02/2001
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 8 ; No violation of Art. 13
Articles	3 ; 8 ; 13
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	Ahmed v. Austria judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, § 38, § 43, § 44 ; Aksoy v. Turkey judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports1996-VI, p. 2286, § 95 ; Aydin v. Turkey judgment of 25 September 1997, pp. 1895-96, § 103 ; B. v. France judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 232-C, § 63 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52 ; Burghartz v. Switzerland judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 280-B, § 24, avis de la Commission, § 47 ; Chahal v. the United Kingdom judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, §§ 73-74 ; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, § 36 ; D. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 2 May 1997, Reports 1997-III, § 49, § 50, §§ 70-71 ; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1991, Series A no. 45, § 41 ; Friedl v. Austria, Series A no. 305-B, avis de la Commission, § 45 ; Kaya v. Turkey judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106, p. 332, § 113 ; Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v. the United Kingdom judgment of 19 February 1997, Reports 1997-1, § 36 ; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1999, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 47-48, §§ 121-124 ; Vilvarajah v. the United Kingdom judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215., p. 39, § 122 et § 123
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN PUNISHMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) ECONOMIC WELL-BEING OF THE COUNTRY" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER"

Application Documents 1

6

BENSAID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Court (Third Section) Decision

25/01/2000

References 15

	115 SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13, 3, 14 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/1999
	375 KAYA v. TURKEY 2, 13, 2, 14, 6, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/02/1998
	55 D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/05/1997
	15 LASKEY, JAGGARD AND BROWN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/02/1997
	722 AKSOY v. TURKEY 3, 5-3, 13, 25-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	42 AHMED v. AUSTRIA 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/12/1996
	370 CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5-4, 13, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/1996
	15 FRIEDL v. AUSTRIA Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	31/01/1995
	57 BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 8, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/02/1994
	75 COSTELLO-ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1993
	53 B. v. FRANCE 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1992
	271 VILVARAJAH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	30/10/1991
	684 BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/1988
	46 D.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	01/12/1986
	126 DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	22/10/1981

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 60

Citations 60

	S.H. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	03/11/2011
	2 AL-ZAWATIA v. SWEDEN Court (Third Section) Decision	22/06/2010
	CIUBOTARU v. MOLDOVA 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/2010
	2 S.H. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 8, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/04/2010
	3 DOLENEC v. CROATIA 3, 6-3, 6-1, 3, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/11/2009
	FRIEND AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	24/11/2009
	ROMUALD KOZLOWSKI v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/01/2009
	19 S. AND MARPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/12/2008
	SLIWA c. POLOGNE Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/12/2008
	1 A.A. v. SWEDEN Court (Third Section) Decision	02/09/2008

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List