PECK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR

Conclusions:

Keywords:

8, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)

28/01/2003

136

8, 13, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)

04/05/2000

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–3 of 3

	1 PALOMO SANCHEZ AND OTHERS v. SPAIN 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	12/09/2011
	AVRAM AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/07/2011
	MOSLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/05/2011

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Decision
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	44647/98
Importance Level	2
Represented by	LEACH, Ph., solicitor, London
Respondent State	the United Kingdom
Date of Introduction	22/04/1996
Date of Decision	15/05/2001
Conclusion	Admissible
Articles	8 ; 13
Law at Issue	Section 163 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 ; Section 111(1) Local Government Act 1972 ; Broadcasting Act 1996 ; Broadcasting Act 1990
Strasbourg Case Law	Rotaru v. Romania judgment [GC], no. 28341/95, § 40, ECHR 2000-V - (4.2.00)
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE"

ECHR CaseLaw