LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY View

Notes

Date	10/11/2005
AppNr	44774/98
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	10; 14; 8; 9-1; 9-2; P1-2
Violated / NonViolated	891014P1-2
Citations	6-1789101114P1-2P1-3P4-235-178914P1-1P1-2P1-3

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 10
No violation of Art. 14
No violation of Art. 8
No violation of Art. 9
No violation of P1-2

Keywords:

(art. 9-1) manifest religion or belief
(art. 9-2) foreseeability
(art. 9-2) interference
(art. 9-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 9-2) prescribed by law
(art. 9-2) protection of public order
(art. 9-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others
(p1-2) right to education
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2005-XI
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH;GEORGIAN
Application Number	44774/98
Importance Level	1
Represented by	MAGNEE X. ; BERZEG, K.
Respondent State	Turkey
Date of Judgment	10/11/2005
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 9 ; No violation of P1-2 ; No violation of Art. 8, 10 and 14
Articles	8 , 9-1 , 9-2 , 10 , 14 , P1-2
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Constitution, Articles 2, 4, 10, 13, 14, 24, 42 and 143; Higher-Education Act (Law no. 2547), transitional section 17; Students Disciplinary Procedure Rules; Circular issued by the Vice Chancellor of Istanbul University on 23 February 1998 ; Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 9 April 1991 ; Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 13 December 1984 ; Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 7 March 1989
Strasbourg Case Law	Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, pp. 14-15, § 26 ; Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission’s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 19, p. 5 ; Barthold v. Germany, judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-22, § 46 ; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I ; C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 10358/83, decision of the Commission of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142 ; Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 February 1982, Series A no. 48, p.14, § 33, and p.19, § 41 ; Casado Coca v. Spain, judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 285-A, p. 18, § 43, and p. 21, § 55 ; Case “relating to certain aspects of laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium” (merits), judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, pp. 30-32, §§ 3-5, and pp. 33-34, § 9 ; Cha'are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417/95, §§ 73 and 84, ECHR 2000-VII ; Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, §§ 112 and 113, ECHR 1999-III ; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 58, § 27 ; Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 66, ECHR 2004-XI ; Dahlab v. Switzerland (dec.) no. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V ; De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, pp. 45-46, § 93 ; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 13-15, § 25 ; Durmaz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos. 46506/99, 46569/99, 46570/99 and 46939/99, 4 September 2001 ; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 49-50, § 65 ; Georgiou v. Greece (dec.), no. 45138/98, 13 January 2000 ; Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, § 46, ECHR 2002-V ; Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, , pp. 18-19, §§ 36 and 38 ; Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, §§ 64, 65 and 67, ECHR 2004-I ; Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XI ; K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII ; Kalaç v. Turkey, judgment of 1 July 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, p. 1209, § 27 ; Karaduman v. Turkey, no. 16278/90, decision of the Commission of 3 May 1993, DR 74, p. 93 ; Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23, pp. 25-26, § 52 ; Kokkinakis v. Greece, judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 17, § 31, and p. 18, § 33 ; Kramelius v. Sweden, no. 21062/92, decision of the Commission of 17 January 1996, unreported ; Kruslin v. France, judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, pp. 21-22, § 29 ; Lukach v. Russia (dec.), no. 48041/99, 16 November 1999 ; Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 121, ECHR 2005-I ; Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1364, § 44, and p. 1365, § 47 ; Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 19, § 41 ; Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, § 73, ECHR 2003-IX ; Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 295-A, p. 19, § 50 ; Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853/99, ECHR 2001-X ; Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 36, ECHR 2002-II ; Serif v. Greece, no. 38178/97, § 53, ECHR 1999-IX ; Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, §§ 91, 93, 95 and 99, ECHR 2003-II ; Sulak v. Turkey, no. 24515/94, decision of the Commission of 17 January 1996, DR 84-A, p. 98 ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 30, § 47 ; Tepeli and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 31876/96, 11 September 2001 ; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 21-22 and p. 27, § 57 ; Valsamis v. Greece, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2325, § 32 ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1957-58, §§ 57 and 58 ; X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 5962/72, decision of the Commission of 13 March 1975, DR 2, p. 50 ; X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 8844/80, decision of the Commission of 9 December 1980, DR 23, p. 228 ; Yanasik v. Turkey, no. 14524/89, decision of the Commission of 6 January 1993, DR 74, p. 14 ; Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, p. 25, § 63
External Sources	Recommendation 1353 (1998) on the access of minorities to higher education, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on 27 January 1998; Recommendation no. R (98) 3 on access to higher education, adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 March 1998; Joint Council of Europe/UNESCO Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region, come into force on 1 February 1999
Keywords	"(Art. 9-1) MANIFEST RELIGION OR BELIEF" "(Art. 9-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 9-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 9-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 9-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF PUBLIC ORDER" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS" "(P1-2) RIGHT TO EDUCATION" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

Application Documents 2

	3 LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY 9 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	29/06/2004
	3 SAHIN contre la TURQUIE Court (Fourth Section) Decision	02/07/2002

References 60

	14 OURANIO TOXO AND OTHERS v. GREECE 6-1, 11 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/10/2005
	18 MURPHY v. IRELAND 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	10/07/2003
	127 CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)	10/06/2003
	70 REFAH PARTISI (THE WELFARE PARTY) AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	13/02/2003
	84 MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 34, 3, 6 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/02/2003
	148 CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2002
	126 PRETTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2, 3, 8, 9, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	29/04/2002
	66 PODKOLZINA v. LATVIA P1-3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/04/2002
	45 GORZELIK AND OTHERS v. POLAND 11 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	20/12/2001
	50 METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 9, 13 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/12/2001
	5 PICHON and SAJOUS v. FRANCE Court (Third Section) Decision	02/10/2001
	14 TEPELI ET AUTRES contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	11/09/2001
	3 DURMAZ, ISIK, UNUTMAZ and SEZAL v. TURKEY Court (First Section) Decision (Partial)	04/09/2001
	122 KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13, 2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/04/2001
	15 GÜNDÜZ contre la TURQUIE Court (Second Section) Decision	29/03/2001
	18 DAHLAB v. SWITZERLAND Court (Second Section) Decision	15/02/2001
	196 GOC v. TURKEY 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/11/2000
	72 HASAN AND CHAUSH v. BULGARIA 9, 13, 6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	39 CHA'ARE SHALOM VE TSEDEK v. FRANCE 9, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	27/06/2000
	126 K. AND T. v. FINLAND 8, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/2000
	5 GEORGIOU v. GREECE Court (Second Section) Decision	13/01/2000
	20 SERIF v. GREECE 9 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/12/1999
	1 LUKACH v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Decision	16/11/1999
	115 SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13, 3, 14 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/1999
	19 MAMATKULOV ET ABDURASULOVIC contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	31/08/1999
	145 CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE P1-1, 14, 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/04/1999
	97 BUSCARINI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO 9 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/02/1999
	66 PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA 14, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	27/03/1998
	117 THE UNITED COMMUNIST PARTY OF TURKEY AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/01/1998
	57 KALAÇ v. TURKEY 9 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	01/07/1997
	92 VAN RAALTE v. THE NETHERLANDS 14, P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1997
	20 VALSAMIS v. GREECE P1-2, 13, 9, 3, 9, P1-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	61 WINGROVE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/11/1996
	62 MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 9 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/09/1996
	6 SULAK v. TURKEY Commission (First Chambe… Decision	17/01/1996
	1 KRAMELIUS v. SWEDEN Commission (Second Chamb… Decision	17/01/1996
	152 FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	21/09/1994
	67 OTTO-PREMINGER-INSTITUT v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	20/09/1994
	50 CASADO COCA v. SPAIN 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/02/1994
	57 BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 8, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/02/1994
	170 SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND 14, 6-1, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/06/1993
	234 KOKKINAKIS v. GREECE 9, 7 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/05/1993
	22 KARADUMAN v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	03/05/1993
	75 COSTELLO-ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1993
	55 YANASIK v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	06/01/1993
	119 KRUSLIN v. FRANCE 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/04/1990
	264 ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 14, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/05/1985
	67 BARTHOLD v. GERMANY 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1985
	23 C. v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	15/12/1983
	87 CAMPBELL AND COSANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM P1-2, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/02/1982
	73 YOUNG, JAMES AND WEBSTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	13/08/1981
	2 X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	09/12/1980
	305 AIREY v. IRELAND 6-1, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	09/10/1979
	327 MARCKX v. BELGIUM 8, 14, P1-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/06/1979
	90 KJELDSEN, BUSK MADSEN AND PEDERSEN v. DENMARK P1-2, 14, 8, 9 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	07/12/1976
	3 X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	13/03/1975
	411 GOLDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1975
	183 CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM 5-4, 5-1, 4, 3, 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	18/06/1971
	149 DELCOURT v. BELGIUM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	17/01/1970
	131 DE WILDE, OOMS et VERSYP contre la BELGIQUE COMMISSION Decision	07/04/1967

Show all (60)

Citations Breakdown

1–10 of 57

Citations 57

	LAUTSI AND OTHERS v. ITALY P1-2 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	18/03/2011
	SIEBENHAAR v. GERMANY 9 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/02/2011
	ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM P1-2 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/01/2011
	JAKOBSKI v. POLAND 9 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/12/2010
	DEMIRBAS c. TURQUIE Court (Second Section) Decision	09/11/2010
	1 SERIFE YIGIT v. TURKEY P1-1, 14, 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	02/11/2010
	3 OBST v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/2010
	2 SCHÜTH v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)	23/09/2010
	SANOMA UITGEVERS B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/09/2010
	2 GRZELAK v. POLAND 14, 9 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/06/2010

ECHR CaseLaw

LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 2

References 60

Citations Breakdown

Citations 57

Similar documents