LINDBERG v. SWEDEN
View
Notes
| Date | 15/01/2004 |
| AppNr | 48198/99 |
| Body | Court (First Section) |
| Type | Decision |
| Articles | 10; 13 |
| Violated / NonViolated | |
| Citations | 6-18 |
- Inadmissible
- (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
- (art. 10-2) interference
- (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
- (art. 10-2) prescribed by law
- (art. 13) arguable claim
- (art. 13) effective remedy
References 3
 |
5
STOCKHOLMS FORSAKRINGS- OCH SKADESTANDSJURIDIK AB v. SWEDEN 
P1-1, 13, 6-1
Court (Second Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
16/09/2003 |  |
|
8
IRIBARNE PÉREZ v. FRANCE
5-4
Court (Chamber)
Judgment (Merits)
|
24/10/1995 | |
|
46
DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN
5-1
Court (Plenary)
Judgment (Merits)
|
26/06/1992 | |
Citations Breakdown
- 1 Violation of Art. 8 by Romania
- 1 Violation of Art. 8
- 1 Not necessary to examine whether Art. 13 violated by Romania
- 1 Violation of Art. 6-1 by Hungary
- 1 Violation of Art. 6-1
- 1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial awards (for Romania)
- 1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial awards (for Hungary)
- 1 Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings
- 1 Partly admissible
- 1 Partly inadmissible
Citations 2
|
35
MONORY v. ROMANIA AND HUNGARY
8, 6-1
Court (Second Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
05/04/2005 | |
|
1
PORUBOVA v. RUSSIA
Court (First Section)
Decision
|
09/12/2004 | |
Similar documents
The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.
Generate Similary List
Generate Similary List