PEDERSEN AND BAADSGAARD v. DENMARK View

Notes

Date	19/06/2003
AppNr	49017/99
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	10-1; 10-2; 36-2; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	6-110
Citations	35-15-35-45-56-16-281013P1-13566-16-3-d810

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 10
No violation of Art. 6-1

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) protection of the reputation of others
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) reasonable time

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	49017/99
Importance Level	2
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Denmark
Date of Judgment	19/06/2003
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 6-1 ; No violation of Art. 10
Articles	6-1 ; 10-1 ; 10-2 ; 36-2
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	Bladet Tromsø and Steensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III ; Capuano v. Italy judgment of 25 June 1987, Series A no. 119, p. 12, § 28 ;: De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium judgment of 24 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, pp. 233-34, § 37 ; Du Roy and Malaurie v. France, no. 34000/96, § 34, ECHR 2000-X ; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45 and § 54, Reports 1999-I ; Goodwin v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 March 1996, Reports 1996-II, p. 500, § 39 ; Hozee v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1100, § 43 ; Humen v. Poland, no. 26614/95, § 66, 15 October 1999 ; Jersild v. Denmark judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 23, § 31 ; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, 27.2.2001 ; Lesnik v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, §§ 53 and 54, 11 March 2003 ; Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 28, § 46 ; Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 23 May 1991, Series A, no. 204, p. 27, § 63 ; Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, ECHR 1999-II, § 67 ; Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, p. 19, §§ 37 and 38 ; Sunday Times (no. 1) v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 38, § 62 ; Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 27, § 63 ; Worm v. Austria, judgment of 29 August 1997, Reports 1997-V, § 50
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE REPUTATION OF OTHERS" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME"

Application Documents 2

	3 PEDERSEN AND BAADSGAARD v. DENMARK 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	17/12/2004
	4 PEDERSEN and BAADSGAARD v. DENMARK Court (First Section) Decision	27/06/2002

References 15

	18 LESNIK v. SLOVAKIA 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	11/03/2003
	113 JERUSALEM v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/02/2001
	12 DU ROY AND MALAURIE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/10/2000
	183 BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. NORWAY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/05/1999
	1002 PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE 6-3-a, 6-1, 6-3-b Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	374 FRESSOZ AND ROIRE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	34 HOZEE v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/05/1998
	162 DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 10, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/02/1997
	94 GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/03/1996
	95 PRAGER AND OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/04/1995
	172 JERSILD v. DENMARK 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1994
	87 THORGEIR THORGEIRSON v. ICELAND 10, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1992
	34 OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA 6-1, 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/05/1991
	201 CAPUANO v. ITALY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1987
	265 LINGENS v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1986

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 93

Citations 93

	KRYUK v. RUSSIA 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/12/2011
	SEMIK-ORZECH v. POLAND 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/2011
	1 PALOMO SANCHEZ AND OTHERS v. SPAIN 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	12/09/2011
	KANIA AND KITTEL v. POLAND 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	MOSLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/05/2011
	3 KASABOVA v. BULGARIA 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/2011
	3 BOZHKOV v. BULGARIA 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/2011
	CONCEICAO LETRIA v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/04/2011
	2 MGN LIMITED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10, 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	18/01/2011
	BARATA MONTEIRO DA COSTA NOGUEIRA AND PATRICIO PEREIRA v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/01/2011

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List