TOURANCHEAU AND JULY v. FRANCE / ECHR

Notes

Date	24/11/2005
AppNr	53886/00
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	10; 10+14
Violated / NonViolated	10
Citations	1010

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 10

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others

Application Documents 1

TOURANCHEAU et JULY contre la FRANCE

Court (First Section) Decision

02/10/2003

References 20

	64 CHAUVY AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)	29/06/2004
	68 MAESTRI v. ITALY 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/02/2004
	48 ERNST AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 10, 8, 6-1, 13, 6, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/07/2003
	93 PEDERSEN AND BAADSGAARD v. DENMARK 6-1, 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits)	19/06/2003
	106 ALLAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 6-1, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/11/2002
	2 GIANOLINI contre l'ITALIE Court (First Section) Decision	29/08/2002
	46 COLOMBANI AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/2002
	40 THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/03/2001
	12 DU ROY AND MALAURIE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/10/2000
	54 OZGUR GUNDEM v. TURKEY 10, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/03/2000
	406 BEYELER v. ITALY P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	05/01/2000
	172 CEYLAN v. TURKEY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	183 BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. NORWAY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/05/1999
	374 FRESSOZ AND ROIRE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	67 GRIGORIADES v. GREECE 10, 7 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1997
	162 DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 10, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/02/1997
	68 CANTONI v. FRANCE 7 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	15/11/1996
	94 GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/03/1996
	107 WORM v. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision	27/11/1995
	97 OBSERVER AND GUARDIAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10, 13, 10, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/11/1991

Show all (20)

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	53886/00
Importance Level	3
Represented by	LECLERC H.
Respondent State	France
Date of Introduction	20/12/1999
Date of Judgment	24/11/2005
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 10
Articles	10 ; 10+14
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 59 and § 62, ECHR 1999-III ; Cantoni v. France, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 35 ; Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 37, ECHR 1999-IV ; Chauvy v. France (dec.), 23 September 2003, no. 64915/01 ; De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, judgment of 24 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, pp. 233-234, § 37 ; Du Roy and Malaurie v. France, no. 34000/96, §§ 27, 34 and 35, ECHR 2000-X ; Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400/96, § 98, 15 July 2003 ; Gianolini v. Italy (dec.), 29 August 2002, no. 34908/97 ; Goodwin v. the United Kingdom du 27 March 1996, Reports 1996-II, pp. 500-501, § 40 ; Grigoriades v. Greece, judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2587, § 37 ; Jersild v. Denmark du 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 26, § 37 ; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I ; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, § 43, ECHR 2000-III ; Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 78 and § 93, ECHR 2004-... ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, § 63 ; Thoma v. Luxembourg, judgment of 29 March 2001, §§ 43 à 45 and 53, Reports 2001-III ; Worm v. Austria du 29 August 1997, Reports 1997-V, pp. 1550-1551, §§ 47, 50 and 54
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) MAINTAINING THE AUTHORITY AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS" PROPORTIONALITY

	BARATA MONTEIRO DA COSTA NOGUEIRA AND PATRICIO PEREIRA v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/01/2011
	1 PUBLICO - COMUNICACAO SOCIAL, S.A. AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/12/2010
	2 COSTA MOREIRA c. PORTUGAL Court (Second Section) Decision	22/09/2009
	2 CAMPOS DAMASO v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/04/2008
	11 JULY AND SARL LIBERATION v. FRANCE 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/02/2008
	2 STOLL v. SWITZERLAND 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	10/12/2007
	7 DUPUIS AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/06/2007
	1 STEFANEC v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/07/2006

ECHR CaseLaw

TOURANCHEAU AND JULY v. FRANCE View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 20

Citations Breakdown

Citations 8

Similar documents