TESLENKO v. UKRAINE / ECHR

Notes

Date	20/12/2011
AppNr	55528/08
Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	3; 35; 35-1; 41
Violated / NonViolated	3

Conclusions:

Non-pecuniary damage - award
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Remainder inadmissible
Violation of Art. 3
Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect)
Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect)

Keywords:

(art. 3) effective investigation
(art. 3) torture
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies

References 20

	1 ALBOREO v. FRANCE 3, 13, 3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/10/2011
	1 KOROBOV v. UKRAINE 3, 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/07/2011
	1 ALEKSANDR SMIRNOV v. UKRAINE 3, 3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/07/2010
	1 NIKIFOROV v. RUSSIA 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/07/2010
	4 OLEKSIY MYKHAYLOVYCH ZAKHARKIN v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1-c, 5-3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/06/2010
	4 LOTAREV v. UKRAINE 3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/04/2010
	4 ARAT v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/11/2009
	13 POLONSKIY v. RUSSIA 3, 5-3, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/03/2009
	12 TURKAN v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/09/2008
	8 MISIAK v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/06/2008
	44 MENESHEVA v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Decision	15/01/2004
	54 ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY 2, 13, 2, 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/07/2002
	27 MATYAR v. TURKEY 3, 8, 14, 18, 6 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	21/02/2002
	519 SALMAN v. TURKEY 2, 3, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	663 ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 3, 13, 5-3, 5-4, 25-1, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/10/1998
	28 SELMOUNI v. FRANCE Commission (Plenary) Decision	25/11/1996
	293 RIBITSCH v. AUSTRIA 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/12/1995
	67 AKKOC v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	11/10/1994
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978

Show all (20)

Similar documents

	4 LOTAREV v. UKRAINE Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 35, 35-1, 41	08/04/2010
	13 POLONSKIY v. RUSSIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5, 5-1, 5-1-a, 5-1-c, 5-3, 6, 6-1, 35, 35-1, 41	19/03/2009
	FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. UKRAINE Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35, 35-1, 41	07/07/2011
	2 NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5, 5-1, 5-1-c, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6, 6-1, 6-3, 6-3-c, 35, 35-1, 41	21/04/2011
	ISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 2, 2-1, 3, 35, 35-1, 41	21/06/2011
	6 CARABULEA v. ROMANIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 2, 2-1, 3, 13, 35, 35-1, 41	13/07/2010
	7 ALIEV v. GEORGIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 34, 35, 35-1, 41	13/01/2009
	12 ARTYOMOV v. RUSSIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 13, 35, 35-1, 41	27/05/2010
	KOVALCHUK v. UKRAINE Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 35, 35-1, 41	04/11/2010
	2 AHARON SCHWARZ v. ROMANIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 35, 35-1, 41	12/01/2010

Originating Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	55528/08
Importance Level	2
Represented by	SHEVCHENKO Z.K.
Respondent State	Ukraine
Date of Judgment	20/12/2011
Conclusion	Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Remainder inadmissible ; Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) ; Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles	3 ; 35 ; 35-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 115, ECHR 2000-X ; Alboreo v. France, no. 51019/08, § 153, 20 October 2011 ; Aleksandr Smirnov v. Ukraine, no. 38683/06, § 59, 15 July 2010 ; Arat v. Turkey, no. 10309/03, § 43, 10 November 2009 ; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25 ; Korobov v. Ukraine, no. 39598/03, § 70, 21 July 2011 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV ; Lotarev v. Ukraine, no. 29447/04, 8 April 2010 ; Matyar v. Turkey, no. 23423/94, § 109, 21 February 2002 ; Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III ; Misiak v. Poland, no. 43837/06, 3 June 2008 ; Nikiforov v. Russia, no. 42837/04, § 46, 1 July 2010 ; Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727/04, § 50, 24 June 2010 ; Polonskiy v. Russia, no. 30033/05, §§ 126-127, 19 March 2009 ; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336 ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V ; Türkan v. Turkey, no. 33086/04, § 43, 18 September 2008 ; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 136, 16 July 2002
Keywords	"(Art. 3) EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION" "(Art. 3) TORTURE" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES"

ECHR CaseLaw

TESLENKO v. UKRAINE View

Notes

ECHR Notes

References 20

Similar documents