HILTON v. the UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date05/03/1976
AppNr5613/72
BodyCommission (Plenary)
TypeDecision
Articles3; 6; 8
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Partly admissible
  • Partly inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 3) degrading treatment
  • (art. 3) inhuman treatment
  • (art. 6-1) access to court
  • (art. 8-1) respect for correspondence



References 0

Citations 2

6
S. v. FRANCE
COMMISSION Decision
06/07/1988
4
D. v. BELGIUM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
12/07/1984


 

Similar documents

5
REED v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Decision 3, 6-1, 8, 35-1
06/12/1979
I.H. v. AUSTRIA
Decision (Final) 3, 5-1-c, 5-1-e, 5-4, 6-1, 8, 10, 13, P4-2-2, 25-1
04/10/1989
1
OLLILA v. FINLAND
Decision 2, 3, 6-1, 8
30/11/1992
SÁRKOZI v. HUNGARY
Decision 3, 6, 8, 13
05/07/1995
118
CYPRUS v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits) 1, 2, 3, 4-1, 5-1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14+8, 14+13, 14+P1-1, 17, 18, 33, 35-1, P1-1, P1-2, P1-3
10/05/2001
IKINCISOY v. TURKEY
Decision 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14
26/02/1996
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Decision 3, 6, 8, 9, 34
06/11/2008
1
PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA
Decision 3, 8, 34, 35-1
14/03/2000
36
ENEA v. ITALY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35-1, 41
17/09/2009
3
COORPLAN-JENNI GMBH AND HASCIC v. AUSTRIA
Decision 6, 3, 8, 14
24/02/2005