MOLKA v. POLAND / ECHR

Notes

Date	11/04/2006
AppNr	56550/00
Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Type	Decision
Articles	13; 14+P1-3; 17; 8-1
Violated / NonViolated
Citations	8P1-3814

Conclusions:

Inadmissible

Keywords:

positive obligations

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Document Type	Decision
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	56550/00
Importance Level	1
Represented by	SENDECKI P., lawyer, Lublin
Respondent State	Poland
Date of Introduction	24/05/1999
Date of Decision	11/04/2006
Applicability	Art. 6 inapplicable ; P1-3 inapplicable
Conclusion	Inadmissible
Articles	8-1 ; 14+P1-3 ; 13 ; 17
Law at Issue	Section 46 Local Elections Act of 16 July 1998 ; Law of 12 April 2001 on Elections to the Sejm and the Senate of the Republic of Poland ; Articles 3, 10 § 2 and 95 § 1 of the Constitution ; Article 163 of the Constitution
Strasbourg Case Law	X and Y v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, §§ 22, 23 ; Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 35, § 71 ; Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, p. 23, § 53 ; Inze v. Austria, judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 17, § 36 ; Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, § 41 ; Pierre-Bloch v. France, judgment of 21 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI, p. 2223, § 50 ; Botta v. Italy, judgment of 24 February 1998, Reports 1998 I, p. 422, § 33 ; Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 40, ECHR 1999 I ; Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 53, ECHR 2002 I ; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61, 65, ECHR 2002 III ; Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003 I ; Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 57, ECHR 2004 VI ; Draon v. France [GC], no. 1513/03, § 105, 6 October 2005 ; Marzari v. Italy (dec.), no. 36448/97, 4 May 1999 ; Maggiolini v. Italy (dec.), no. 35800/97, 13 January 2000 ; Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I ; Malarde v. France (dec.), no. 46813/99, 5 September 2000 ; Zehnalová and Zehnal v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 38621/97, ECHR 2002 V ; O'Reilly and Others (dec.), no. 54725/00, 28 February 2002 ; Sentges v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 27677/02, 8 July 2003 ; Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova (dec.), no. 14462/03, ECHR 2005- Eur. Comm. H.R. No. 10650/83, Dec. 17.5.85, D.R. 42, p. 212 ; No. 11391/85, Dec. 5.7.85, D.R. 43, p. 236
External Sources	Recommendation No. R (92 of the Committee of Ministers of 9 April 1992 on a coherent policy for people with disabities ; Recommendation 1185 (1992) adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on 7 May 1992 on rehabilitation policies for the disabled ; Revised European Social Charter adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 1-4 April 1996 and opened for signature on 3 May 1996 ; Recommendation No. Rec (2006)5 of the Committee of Ministers of 5 april 2006 on the Council of Europe Action Plan to promote the rights and full participation of people with disabilities in society
Keywords	"POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"

Google

References 29

	32 DRAON v. FRANCE P1-1, 13, 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/10/2005
	12 PENTIACOVA AND 48 OTHERS v. MOLDOVA Court (Fourth Section) Decision	04/01/2005
	52 VON HANNOVER v. GERMANY 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	24/06/2004
	8 O'REILLY and OTHERS v. IRELAND Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)	04/09/2003
	37 VON HANNOVER contre l'ALLEMAGNE Court (Third Section) Decision	08/07/2003
	8 SENTGES v. THE NETHERLANDS Court (Second Section) Decision	08/07/2003
	36 PECK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/01/2003
	14 ZEHNALOVA and ZEHNAL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC Court (Second Section) Decision	14/05/2002
	126 PRETTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2, 3, 8, 9, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	29/04/2002
	58 MIKULIC v. CROATIA Court (Fourth Section) Decision	07/12/2000
	2 MALARDE contre la FRANCE Court (Third Section) Decision	05/09/2000
	15 CHEREPKOV v. RUSSIA Court (Third Section) Decision	25/01/2000
	1 MAGGIOLINI contre l'ITALIE Court (Second Section) Decision	13/01/2000
	6 MARZARI v. ITALY Court (Second Section) Decision (Final)	04/05/1999
	88 MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM P1-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/02/1999
	49 BOTTA v. ITALY Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/02/1998
	49 PIERRE-BLOCH v. FRANCE Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	21/10/1997
	5 TIMKE v. GERMANY Commission (Plenary) Decision	11/09/1995
	285 POWELL AND RAYNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	21/02/1990
	131 INZE v. AUSTRIA 14, P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/10/1987
	103 MATHIEU-MOHIN AND CLERFAYT v. BELGIUM P1-3, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	02/03/1987
	8 BOOTH-CLIBBORN and others v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	05/07/1985
	264 ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 14, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/05/1985
	8 CLERFAYT, LEGROS and ALII v. BELGIUM Commission (Plenary) Decision	17/05/1985
	94 X AND Y v. THE NETHERLANDS 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/03/1985
	8 INZE V. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision	05/12/1984
	7 X. v. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision	12/07/1976
	4 X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	12/07/1976
	66 X. contre les PAYS-BAS COMMISSION Decision	18/09/1961

Show all (29)

	FARCAS c. ROUMANIE Court (Third Section) Decision	14/09/2010
	1 HUC c. ROUMANIE ET ALLEMAGNE Court (Third Section) Decision	01/12/2009
	3 BIGAEVA v. GREECE 8, 14, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/05/2009
	21 LYKOUREZOS v. GREECE P1-3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/06/2006

ECHR CaseLaw

MOLKA v. POLAND View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Google

References 29

Citations Breakdown

Citations 4

Similar documents