SENATOR LINES GmbH v. AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, DENMARK, FINLAND, FRANCE, GERMANY, GREECE, IRELAND, ITALY, LUXEMBOURG, the NETHERLANDS, PORTUGAL, SPAIN, SWEDEN and the UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date	10/03/2004
AppNr	56672/00
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Decision
Articles	6
Violated / NonViolated
Citations	6-16-3-c825-1P1-11418

Conclusions:

• Inadmissible

ECHR Notes

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Decision
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2004-IV
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	56672/00
Importance Level	1
Represented by	ZINSMEISTER, U., Hashurst, lawyer, Brussels ; WAELBROEK, D., Hashurst, lawyer, Brussels
Respondent State	Austria ; Belgium ; Denmark ; Finland ; France ; Germany ; Greece ; Ireland ; Italy ; Luxembourg ; the Netherlands ; Portugal ; Spain ; Sweden ; the United Kingdom
Date of Introduction	30/03/2000
Date of Decision	10/03/2004
Conclusion	Inadmissible
Articles	6
Strasbourg Case Law	Klass and Others v. Germany, judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, pp. 17-18, § 33 ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161 ; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI ; Constantinescu v. Romania, no. 28871/95, §§ 42, 43, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Segi and Gestoras Pro Amnistia and Others v. Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 6422/02 and 9916/02, ECHR 2002-V Eur. Comm. H.R. No. 28204/95, Dec. 4.12.95, D.R. 83-B, p. 130

References 8

	11 SEGI AND OTHERS v. 15 STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION  Court (Third Section) Decision	23/05/2002
	458 DALBAN v. ROMANIA  10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/1999
	88 MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  P1-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/02/1999
	26 TAUIRA AND 18 OTHERS v. FRANCE Commission (Plenary) Decision	04/12/1995
	15 M. & Co. v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY COMMISSION Decision	09/02/1990
	308 SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  3, 6-3-c, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/1989
	234 KLASS AND OTHERS v. GERMANY  8, 13, 6 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	06/09/1978
	5 CONFEDERATION FRANCAISE DEMOCRATIQUE DU TRAVAIL v. the EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, alternatively : THEIR MEMBER STATES a) jointly and b) severally Commission (Plenary) Decision	10/07/1978

Show all (8)

Citations Breakdown

• Keyword
• Article
• Conclusion
• Country
• Map
• Year

• 5 (art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
• 4 (art. 34) victim
• 3 (art. 14) discrimination
• 2 (art. 6-1) impartial tribunal
• 2 (art. 13) right to an effective remedy
• 2 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
• 1 (art. 34) hinder the exercise of the right of petition
• 1 (art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
• 1 (art. 6-1) independent tribunal
• 1 (art. 6-1) equality of arms
• 1 (art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
• 1 (art. 6) criminal proceedings
• 1 []
• 1 (p1-1-2) secure the payment of contributions or penalties
• 1 (p1-1-2) general interest
• 1 (p1-1-2) control of the use of property
• 1 (p1-1-1) peaceful enjoyment of possessions
• 1 (p1-2) right to education
• 1 (art. 34) individual
• 1 (p1-1-1) interference

• 5 13
• 5 14
• 4 6
• 4 6-1
• 3 3
• 3 34
• 3 8
• 3 P1-1
• 2 35
• 2 41
• 1 P1-2
• 1 25-1
• 1 P1-1-2
• 1 []
• 1 18
• 1 6-1+6-3-c
• 1 6-3-c
• 1 35-1
• 1 P1-3
• 1 6-3

• 8 Inadmissible
• 2 Violation of P1-1
• 2 Pecuniary damage - reserved
• 1 Preliminary objection rejected (abuse of process)
• 1 []
• 1 Partly inadmissible
• 1 Partly admissible
• 1 Non-pecuniary damage - award
• 1 Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c
• 1 Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (victim)
• 1 Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
• 1 Preliminary objection dismissed (victim)
• 1 Non-pecuniary damage - reserved
• 1 Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
• 1 Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
• 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13
• 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1
• 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5
• 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 3
• 1 No violation of Art. 18

• 5 France
• 2 Turkey
• 2 United Kingdom
• 1 []
• 1 Russia
• 1 Georgia
• 1 Switzerland

• 1 2011
• 2 2010
• 3 2009
• 2 2005
• 2 2004
• 1 1996
• 1 1991
• 1 1990
• 1 1987

1–10 of 14

Sort: Date 

• Date
• Citations
• Importance

Citations 14

× Keyword: (art. 6-2) charged with a criminal offence

	LIGUE DES MUSULMANS DE SUISSE ET AUTRES c. SUISSE  Court (Second Section) Decision	28/06/2011
	7 SAKHNOVSKIY v. RUSSIA  6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/11/2010
	65 DEMOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY  Court (Grand Chamber) Decision	01/03/2010
	MOON v. FRANCE Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/07/2009
	4 GRIFHORST v. FRANCE  P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/02/2009
	1 KIKOLASHVILI v. GEORGIA Court (Second Section) Decision (Final)	03/02/2009
	SKENDER v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"  Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)	10/03/2005
	SIJAKU v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)	27/01/2005
	C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Partial)	14/12/2004
	2 C. and D. and S. and OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	31/08/2004