X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

Date	18/07/1974
AppNr	5712/72
Body	Commission (Plenary)
Type	Decision
Articles	3; 8
Violated / NonViolated

Conclusions:

Inadmissible

Keywords:

(art. 3) inhuman punishment
(art. 8-1) respect for family life

References 2

	8 X. v. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision	03/04/1967
	5 X. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Commission (Plenary) Decision	23/05/1966

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 23

Citations 23

	4 OSPINA VARGAS contre l'ITALIE Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)	06/04/2000
	SHKELZEN v. GERMANY Court (Fourth Section) Decision	20/01/2000
	3 NATOLI contre l'ITALIE Commission (Plenary) Decision	18/05/1998
	3 LABITA contre l'ITALIE Commission (Plenary) Decision	20/10/1997
	SAVAS contre l'ITALIE Commission (Second Chamb… Decision	26/02/1997
	McKENNY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	28/11/1994
	VELLA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	28/11/1994
	6 HACISULEYMANOGLU v. ITALY Commission (Plenary) Decision	20/10/1994
	KINSELLA AND MULVANEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (First Chambe… Decision	01/09/1993
	HOLMES, McGEOUGH AND HOLMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (First Chambe… Decision	01/09/1993

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List