SEGERSTEDT-WIBERG AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN / ECHR

Conclusions:

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom to hold opinions
(art. 11-1) freedom of association
(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) national security
(art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law

8, 10, 11, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)

06/06/2006

( ! ) Notice: Undefined index: in /var/www/html/oburlaca/echr/html/tpl/doc/inc_doc_list.tpl on line 68
Call Stack
#	Time	Memory	Function	Location
1	0.0001	230072	{main}( )	.../index.php:0
2	0.0031	535152	include_template( )	.../index.php:23
3	0.0031	535312	getContent( )	.../utils.php:65
4	0.0032	552944	include( '/var/www/html/oburlaca/echr/html/tpl/doc/doc.tpl' )	.../utils.php:51
5	0.0368	1339712	include( '/var/www/html/oburlaca/echr/html/tpl/doc/inc_doc_list.tpl' )	.../doc.tpl:149

Decision

28/02/1996

COMMISSION Decision (Partial)

12/10/1992

COMMISSION Decision

06/07/1988

150

8, 10, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)

26/03/1987

Originating Body	Court (Second Section)
Document Type	Decision (Partial)
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	62332/00
Importance Level	2
Represented by	TOLLBORG D., lawyer, Vastra Frolunda
Respondent State	Sweden
Date of Introduction	07/10/2000
Date of Decision	20/09/2005
Conclusion	Partly inadmissible ; Partly admissible
Articles	8 ; 10 ; 11 ; 13
Strasbourg Case Law	Isabel Hilton v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 12015/86, 6 July 1988 Eur. Comm. H.R. No. 25147/94, Dec. 28.2.96, D.R. 84, p. 106
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO HOLD OPINIONS" "(Art. 11-1) FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION" "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"

	R.R. v. POLAND 3, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/05/2011
	1 KAMBUROV v. BULGARIA (II) Court (Fifth Section) Decision	06/01/2011

ECHR CaseLaw