MAYZIT v. RUSSIA View

Notes

Date	20/01/2005
AppNr	63378/00
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	3; 41; 5-4; 6-3-b; 6-3-c
Violated / NonViolated	35-46-3-b6-3-c
Citations	35-15-1-b5-1-c5-1-e5-35-45-566-16-26-36-3-b6-3-c6-3-d810111334P1-1P7-235-15-1-c5-35-45-56-16-26-3-b6-3-c6-3-d78131834

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 6-3-b
No violation of Art. 6-3-c
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Violation of Art. 3
Violation of Art. 5-4

Keywords:

(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 5-4) speediness of review
(art. 6-3) rights of defence
(art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
(art. 6-3-c) legal assistance of his own choosing

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	63378/00
Importance Level	2
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Russia
Date of Introduction	10/07/2000
Date of Judgment	20/01/2005
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No violation of Art. 6-3-c ; No violation of Art. 6-3-b ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Articles	3 ; 5-4 ; 6-3-b ; 6-3-c ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Code of Criminal Procedure of 1960, Articles 47 and 220
Strasbourg Case Law	Can v. Austria, no. 9300/81, Commission's report of 12 July 1984, Series A no. 96, § 53 ; Croissant v. Germany, judgment of 25 September 1992, Series A no. 237-B, § 29 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162 ; Jespers v. Belgium, no. 8403/78, Commission's report of 14 December 1981, DR 27, p. 61, §§ 55, 57 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 93, ECHR 2002-VI ; Kamasinski v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, § 65 ; Kudla v. Poland, no. 30210/96, § 92, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy, judgment of 6 April 2000, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-IV, § 119 ; Peers v. Greece, no; 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III ; R.M.D. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, § 51 ; Raninen v. Finland, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1997-VIII, pp. 2821-22, § 55 ; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 67-68, ECHR 2003-X ; Timofeyev v. Russia, no. 58263/00, §§ 51-52, 23 October 2003 ; Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 170-A, § 35 ; X v. Norway, no. 5923/72, Commission decision of 30 May 1975, Decisions and Reports DR 3, p. 43 ; Zamir v. the United Kingdom, no. 9174/80, Commission's report of 11 October 1983, DR 40, p. 42, §§ 107-108
Keywords	"(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-4) SPEEDINESS OF REVIEW" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE FACILITIES" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE TIME" "(Art. 6-3-c) LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF HIS OWN CHOOSING"

Application Documents 1

3

MAYZIT v. RUSSIA

Court (First Section) Decision

29/04/2003

References 10

	33 TIMOFEYEV v. RUSSIA 6-1, P1-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	23/10/2003
	218 RYABYKH v. RUSSIA 6-1, P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits)	24/07/2003
	1907 KUDLA v. POLAND 5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	32 R.M.D. v. SWITZERLAND 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/09/1997
	35 CROISSANT v. GERMANY 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/09/1992
	61 VAN DER LEER v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-1, 5-2, 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1990
	189 KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA 6-1, 6-1, 14, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/12/1989
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978
	12 X. v. NORWAY Commission (Plenary) Decision	30/05/1975

Citations Breakdown

1–10 of 125

Citations 125

	ZAGORODNIY v. UKRAINE 6-1, 6-3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/11/2011
	TAGGATIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/10/2011
	MIROSLAW ZIELINSKI v. POLAND 3, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/09/2011
	HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 6-2 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/07/2011
	MUSIALEK AND BACZYNSKI v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/07/2011
	BREUKHOVEN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 6-1, 6-3-d Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/07/2011
	1 KHODORKOVSKIY v. RUSSIA 3, 5-1-b, 5-3, 5-4, 3, 5-1-c, 5-4, 18 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	31/05/2011
	VADIM KOVALEV v. RUSSIA 3, 5-3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/05/2011
	ILYADI v. RUSSIA 3, 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/05/2011
	1 KUPTSOV AND KUPTSOVA v. RUSSIA 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/03/2011

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List