BALCIK v. TURKEY  View

Notes

Date26/04/2005
AppNr63878/00
BodyCourt (Second Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles29-3; 35-1; 41; 6-1; 6-3-c
Violated / NonViolated6-1
Citations10
Conclusions:
  • Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 6
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 6 with regard to the remainder of the complaints
  • Pecuniary damage - claim rejected
  • Preliminary objection rejected (six-month period)
  • Violation of Art. 6-1
Keywords:
  • (art. 35-1) six month period
  • (art. 6) criminal proceedings
  • (art. 6-1) impartial tribunal
  • (art. 6-1) independent tribunal



Application Documents 1

BALCIK contre la TURQUIE
Court (Third Section) Decision (Partial)
12/09/2002

Google



References 6

346
GENCEL v. TURKEY
6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
23/10/2003
211
ÖZEL contre la TURQUIE
Court (First Section) Decision (Partial)
04/04/2000
299
FINDLAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/02/1997
144
INCAL contre la TURQUIE
Commission (Plenary) Decision
16/10/1995
85
CIRAKLAR v. TURKEY
Commission (Plenary) Decision
19/01/1995
24
COLACIOPPO contre l'ITALIE
COMMISSION Decision (Final)
05/09/1989

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

Citations 1

KILIC AND EREN v. TURKEY
10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
29/11/2011


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List