NUR RADYO VE TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIGI A.S. v. TURKEY  View

Notes

• Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
• Not necessary to examine Art. 14
• Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
• Violation of Art. 10

• (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
• (art. 10-2) duties and responsibilities
• (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
• (art. 14) discrimination

Google

References 8

	3 OZGUR RADYO-SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. TURKEY (No. 1)  10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/03/2006
	19 GINIEWSKI v. FRANCE  10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)	31/01/2006
	79 RADIO FRANCE AND OTHERS v. FRANCE  Court (Second Section) Decision	23/09/2003
	15 GÜNDÜZ contre la TURQUIE  Court (Second Section) Decision	29/03/2001
	67 OTTO-PREMINGER-INSTITUT v. AUSTRIA  10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	20/09/1994
	55 GROPPERA RADIO AG AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND  10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	28/03/1990
	24 COLACIOPPO contre l'ITALIE COMMISSION Decision (Final)	05/09/1989
	277 HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  10, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	07/12/1976

Citations Breakdown

1–4 of 4

Sort: Date 

• Date
• Citations
• Importance

Citations 4

	NUR RADYO VE TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIGI A.S. v. TURKEY (no. 2)  10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/10/2010
	MEHMET CEVHER ILHAN v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/01/2009
	UNAY v. TURKEY Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/10/2008
	1 KUTLULAR v. TURKEY  10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/04/2008

Similar documents