X. and Y. v. the NETHERLANDS  View

Notes

Date19/12/1974
AppNr6753/74
BodyCommission (Plenary)
TypeDecision
Articles13; 8; P1-1
Violated / NonViolated
Citations25-15-46-16-3-c81314P1-1236-18914
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) arguable claim
  • (art. 8-1) respect for private life
  • (art. 8-2) interference
  • (art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
  • (art. 8-2) protection of health
  • (art. 8-2) protection of morals
  • (p1-1-2) secure the payment of contributions or penalties



References 2

2
X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
Commission (Plenary) Decision
03/02/1971
35
X., Y., Z., V., W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
Commission (Plenary) Decision
15/12/1967

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

Citations 22

A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 
5-1, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
29/11/2011
G. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Court (Fourth Section) Decision
30/08/2011
2
S.H. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 
8, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
01/04/2010
1
BOGUMIL v. PORTUGAL 
6-3-c, 6-1, 3, 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
07/10/2008
1
BENDERSKIY v. UKRAINE 
6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
15/11/2007
2
EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
2, 8, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
10/04/2007
WILKINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Court (Fourth Section) Decision
28/02/2006
15
REIGADO RAMOS v. PORTUGAL
8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)
22/11/2005
VAMOSI v. HUNGARY
Court (Second Section) Decision
23/03/2004
6
KALLO v. HUNGARY 
Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)
14/12/2003


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List