KUTLULAR v. TURKEY  View

Notes

Date29/04/2008
AppNr73715/01
BodyCourt (Fourth Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles10; 14+10; 29-3; 35-1; 41
Violated / NonViolated10
Conclusions:
  • Costs and expenses award
  • Non-pecuniary damage - award
  • Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
  • Preliminary objection joined to the merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
  • Remainder inadmissible
  • Violation of Art. 10
Keywords:
  • (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
  • (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
  • (art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
  • (art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others



References 14

4
NUR RADYO VE TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIGI A.S. v. TURKEY 
10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/11/2007
8
AYDIN TATLAV v. TURKEY 
10, 6-1, 6-3-b Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
02/05/2006
28
KERETCHACHVILI v. GEORGIA 
Court (Second Section) Decision
02/05/2006
19
GINIEWSKI v. FRANCE 
10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)
31/01/2006
18
YASAR KAPLAN v. TURKEY
10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/01/2006
57
LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY 
9, P1-2, 8, 10, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
10/11/2005
24
ASLI GUNES v. TURKEY
10, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/09/2005
3
ERGIN v. TURKEY (NO. 5)
10, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
16/06/2005
15
GÜNDÜZ contre la TURQUIE 
Court (Second Section) Decision
29/03/2001
1139
GARCIA RUIZ v. SPAIN 
6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
21/01/1999
172
JERSILD v. DENMARK 
10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
23/09/1994
67
OTTO-PREMINGER-INSTITUT v. AUSTRIA 
10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
20/09/1994
8
BARIR ET AMUUR contre la FRANCE
Commission (Plenary) Decision
18/10/1993
277
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
10, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)
07/12/1976

Citations 1

MEHMET CEVHER ILHAN v. TURKEY
Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
13/01/2009


 

Similar documents

2
FRANKOWICZ v. POLAND
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 10, 10-2, 29-3, 35-1, 41
16/12/2008
8
KANDZHOV v. BULGARIA
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 5-1, 5-1-c, 5-3, 10, 29-3, 35-1, 41
06/11/2008
4
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 10, 29-3, 34, 35-1, 41
17/07/2008
1
AKTAN v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 10, 29-3, 34, 41
23/09/2008
7
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 10, 10-1, 10-2, 41
03/02/2009
2
CHALABI v. FRANCE
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 10, 10-2, 29-3, 41
18/09/2008
5
DYUNDIN v. RUSSIA
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 10, 10-2, 29-3, 41
14/10/2008
4
KOC AND TAMBAS v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 6-3-b, 10, 29-3, 41
21/03/2006
3
DUZGOREN v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 10, 13, 29-3, 41
09/11/2006
1
KUBASZEWSKI v. POLAND
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 10, 10-1, 10-2, 41
02/02/2010