X. c. THE UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date03/05/1978
AppNr8065/77
BodyCommission (Plenary)
TypeDecision
Articles8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated
Citations5-15-35-48138
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 8-1) respect for family life
  • (art. 8-1) respect for private life
  • (art. 8-2) interference
  • (art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
  • (art. 8-2) prescribed by law
  • (art. 8-2) prevention of crime
  • (art. 8-2) prevention of disorder
  • (art. 8-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others



References 0

Citations Breakdown

Citations 5

2
ERYK KOZLOWSKI v. POLAND
Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
04/11/2008
25
BAGINSKI v. POLAND
5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
11/10/2005
13
KLAMECKI v. POLAND (No. 2) 
5-3, 5-4, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
03/04/2003
11
MESSINA v. ITALY (No. 2) 
8, 13, 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)
28/09/2000
5
NIMMO v. the UNITED KINGDOM
COMMISSION Decision
11/10/1988


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List