SINGH AND UPPAL v. UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date02/05/1979
AppNr8244/78
BodyCommission (Plenary)
TypeDecision
Articles13; 14; 6-1; 8
Violated / NonViolated
Citations5-15-35-411P1-35-166-1
Conclusions:
  • Partly admissible
  • Partly inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) effective remedy
  • (art. 14) discrimination
  • (art. 6-1) civil rights and obligations
  • (art. 6-1) determination (civil)
  • (art. 8-1) respect for family life



References 0

Citations Breakdown

Citations 12

BEKAOURI c. GEORGIE
Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)
29/06/2010
66
SVIPSTA v. LATVIA 
5-1, 11, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
09/03/2006
1
HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2) 
P1-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
06/10/2005
8
KADIKIS contre la LETTONIE (n° 2) 
Court (First Section) Decision
25/09/2003
38
HUTCHISON REID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
5-4, 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
20/02/2003
61
STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
5-1, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/05/2002
80
MAAOUIA v. FRANCE 
6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
05/10/2000
SABALLY v. FINLAND
Commission (First Chambe… Decision
28/02/1996
S. v. THE NETHERLANDS
COMMISSION Decision
01/04/1992
S. v. SWEDEN
COMMISSION Decision
10/10/1990


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List