GLIMMERVEEN and HAGENBEEK v. the NETHERLANDS View
Notes
| Date | 11/10/1979 |
| AppNr | 8348/78; 8406/78 |
| Body | Commission (Plenary) |
| Type | Decision |
| Articles | 10-2; 17; P1-3 |
| Violated / NonViolated | |
| Citations | 81011P1-310P1-3 |
- Inadmissible
- (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
- (art. 10-2) interference
- (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
- (art. 10-2) prescribed by law
- (art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
- (art. 14) discrimination
- (art. 17) destruction of rights and freedoms
- (p1-3) stand for election
References 2
 |
277
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
10, P1-1, 14, 18
Court (Plenary)
Judgment (Merits)
|
07/12/1976 |  |
|
15
W., X., Y. and Z. v. BELGIUM
Commission (Plenary)
Decision
|
30/05/1975 | |
Citations Breakdown
- 4 (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
- 3 (art. 34) victim
- 2 (art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
- 2 (art. 11-2) interference
- 2 (art. 11-2) necessary in a democratic society
- 2 (art. 17) destruction of rights and freedoms
- 2 (art. 10-2) interference
- 2 (p1-3) stand for election
- 2 margin of appreciation
- 2 (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
- 2 (p1-3) vote
- 1 (art. 8-1) respect for private life
- 1 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
- 1 (art. 10-2) protection of the reputation of others
- 1 (art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
- 1 positive obligations
- 1 (art. 14) discrimination
- 1 (art. 8-1) respect for family life
- 1 (art. 41) jurisdiction to give orders or grant injunctions
- 1 (art. 12) found a family
- 4 Inadmissible
- 3 Violation of P1-3
- 3 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
- 3 Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
- 2 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
- 2 Pecuniary damage - financial award
- 2 Violation of Art. 11
- 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 10
- 1 Violation of Art. 8
- 1 No violation of P1-3
- 1 Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed
- 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 12
- 1 Costs and expenses partial award
- 1 Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed
- 1 Remainder inadmissible
- 1 No violation of Art. 10
- 1 Remainder admissible
- 1 Remainder inadmissble
- 1 Preliminary objection dismissed (lack of victim status)
- 1 Violation of Art. 10
Citations 14
|
2
FRODL v. AUSTRIA 
P1-3
Court (First Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
08/04/2010 | |
|
FERET v. BELGIUM
10
Court (Second Section)
Judgment (Merits)
|
16/07/2009 | |
|
IMREK c. TURQUIE
Court (Third Section)
Decision
|
24/06/2008 | |
|
2
DICKSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
8
Court (Grand Chamber)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
04/12/2007 | |
|
1
ZDANOKA v. LATVIA
P1-3
Court (Grand Chamber)
Judgment (Merits)
|
16/03/2006 | |
|
3
WITZSCH v. GERMANY
Court (First Section)
Decision
|
13/12/2005 | |
|
1
HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
P1-3
Court (Grand Chamber)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
06/10/2005 | |
|
5
W.P. AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Court (Third Section)
Decision
|
02/09/2004 | |
|
42
ZDANOKA v. LATVIA
P1-3, 11
Court (First Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
17/06/2004 | |
|
22
GARAUDY v. FRANCE
Court (Fourth Section)
Decision
|
24/06/2003 | |
Similar documents
The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.
Generate Similary List
Generate Similary List