B. and D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

Date	13/10/1986
AppNr	9303/81
Body	Commission (Plenary)
Type	Decision
Articles	2; 3; P1-2
Violated / NonViolated
Citations	313

Conclusions:

Partly admissible
Partly inadmissible

References 2

	3 X., Y. and Z. v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	13/10/1982
	16 X. v. NETHERLANDS Commission (Plenary) Decision	05/12/1978

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–9 of 9

Citations 9

	HARITONOV v. MOLDOVA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/07/2011
	2 I. D. v. MOLDOVA 3, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/11/2010
	4 NOVINSKIY v. RUSSIA Court (Third Section) Decision	06/12/2007
	26 KOVAL v. UKRAINE Court (Second Section) Decision (Final)	30/03/2004
	1 YOKUS, FARISOGULLARI, SEFTALI, ZENGIN, ALTINDAG, YARDIMCI, CICEK, KAYA, KARAKAS, SUZER, SEVER AND ZENGIN v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision (Partial)	03/04/1995
	SMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (First Chambe… Decision	12/10/1994
	LEFEVRE contre la FRANCE Commission (Second Chamb… Decision	02/03/1994
	CLAESSON AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN Commission (Plenary) Decision	01/07/1992
	SOCIETE VAN TUYL BEHEER B.V. contre les PAYS-BAS COMMISSION Decision	06/01/1992

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List