ECHR CaseLaw

Login

B. and D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date13/10/1986
AppNr9303/81
BodyCommission (Plenary)
TypeDecision
Articles2; 3; P1-2
Violated / NonViolated
Citations313
Conclusions:
  • Partly admissible
  • Partly inadmissible



References 2

3
X., Y. and Z. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
13/10/1982
16
X. v. NETHERLANDS
Commission (Plenary) Decision
05/12/1978

Citations Breakdown

1–9 of 9
Sort: Date 

Citations 9

HARITONOV v. MOLDOVA
3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
05/07/2011
2
I. D. v. MOLDOVA
3, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
30/11/2010
4
NOVINSKIY v. RUSSIA
Court (Third Section) Decision
06/12/2007
26
KOVAL v. UKRAINE 
Court (Second Section) Decision (Final)
30/03/2004
1
YOKUS, FARISOGULLARI, SEFTALI, ZENGIN, ALTINDAG, YARDIMCI, CICEK, KAYA, KARAKAS, SUZER, SEVER AND ZENGIN v. TURKEY
Commission (Plenary) Decision (Partial)
03/04/1995
SMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (First Chambe… Decision
12/10/1994
LEFEVRE contre la FRANCE
Commission (Second Chamb… Decision
02/03/1994
CLAESSON AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
Commission (Plenary) Decision
01/07/1992
SOCIETE VAN TUYL BEHEER B.V. contre les PAYS-BAS
COMMISSION Decision
06/01/1992


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List